📋
English and Linguistics Department
📄 Pages: 65 🧠 Words: 7490 📚 Chapters: 5 🗂️️ For: PROJECT
👁️🗨️️️ Views: 470
Abstract
Communication as a social tool includes a wide range of functions such as instruction, persuasion,
education, entertainment, development and so on. Over the ages, all the communication mediums
have evolved themselves to accommodate the various functions of communication and this is true of
the theatre as well. This paper is a humble endeavour towards interpreting the theatre as a
communication medium that can significantly contribute towards ably performing the various
2
communication functions. It also seeks to deliberate upon the need for approaching the study of
communication in the Indian perspective drawing comparisons between Aristotle's Poetics and
Rhetoric and Bharata's Nātyasāstra.
Key Words: Theatre, Communication, Nātyasāstra, Poetics, Rhetoric
Introduction
"In a universe that is suddenly deprived of illusions and of light, man feels a
stranger. His is an irremediable exile - . This divorce between man and his life,
from his ideas given in another treatise written by him, the Rhetoric, which essentially deals with the
art of conversation. The model includes five essential elements of communication, i.e., the speaker,
the speech or message, the audience, the occasion and the effect. In the Rhetoric, Aristotle presents
his ideas on the art of speech construction by speakers for different audiences on different occasions
for producing different effects. However, it would not be out of place to assume that Aristotle's idea
was based on his personal experience of the Greek theatre and shaped by his observations on the
same. As it appears, the speaker that Aristotle talks of, in all likelihood, refers to the actor while the
occasion refers to the act of theatrical presentation. The remaining elements are important
components of any dramatic act, that is, the speech by the actor, the audience experiencing the act
and the effect produced in the minds of the audience.
While Aristotle's model does give us a basic idea on the communication process that apparently
takes place in our daily lives, it is found lacking in certain aspects of communication. Perhaps owing
to the fact that Aristotle was primarily addressing the subject of speech construction in the Rhetoric,
the importance of non-verbal communication in any act of communication seems to have been
completely overlooked by him. This aspect of non-verbal communication has been comprehensively
discussed and addressed in Bharata's Nātyasāstra. Having said so, Bharata does not undermine the
importance of speech in communication. Thus says Bharata, "One should take care of words - In
this world, the Śāstras are made up of words and rest on words; hence there is nothing beyond
words, and words are the source of everything. The Verbal representation is related to [a knowledge
of] nouns (nāma), verbs (ākhyta), particle (nipāta), preposition (upasarga), nominal suffix
(taddhita), compound words (samāsa), euphonic combination (sandhi) and case-endings (vibhakti)."
(Ghosh, 1950) Speech, Bharata, terms as vācika. However, Bharata takes note of the other aspects as
well that play a vital role in deciding the outcome of any communication endeavour. These include:
1. Physical representation (Angikā)
2. Costumes and make-up (Āharya)
3. Temperament (Sattva)
9
Thus, Bharata emphasizes on approaching communication in a four-fold manner of expression
comprising of vācika, angikā, sattva and āharya. While Bharata postulates the four-fold principle of
communication primarily in parlance of drama, it would not be out of place to assume that Bharata
also had in his mind the universe while laying down the tenets. As Bharata ascribes the following
words to Lord Brahma, "The drama as I have devised, is a mimicry of actions and conducts of
people, which is rich in various emotions, and which depicts different situations." Besides, this fourfold
approach is indeed, a more, practical and hands on approach towards analysing and decoding the
process of communication.
Communication, after all, is not merely about expression of either words or actions. Rather, it
incorporates all the aspects of human expression that can play an effective part on conveying the
ultimate meaning to the recipient of the information. The absence or disproportionate representation
of any one of the given aspects necessarily results in confusion in the minds of the audience and that
is what gives rise to the feeling of absurdity. No wonder then, the Indian approach to communication
is referred to as sādhāranikarana which essentially means establishing a feeling of uniformity
between the participants involved in an act of communication. This, in turn, can be achieved only
when commonness is attained at the various intermediary levels of human interaction between the
communicator and the communicated through their respective abilities. It is this feeling of
commonness and uniformity that is the driving force of communication in this universe. The theatre
being a miniature representation of the same is no different.
References
1. Andal, N. (2004). Communication Theories and Models. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
2. Ghosh, M. (1950). The Natya Shastra (English Translation) Volume I (Chapters I-XXVII).
Calcutta: The Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.
3. Kasoma, K. (1974). Theatre And Development. Retrieved September 2013, from http://www.cfhst.
net: http://www.cf-hst.net/unicef-temp/Doc-Repository/doc/doc479081.PDF
4. Kumar, H. (2006). Folk Media and Rural Development. Retrieved September 2013, from
http://www.satishserial.com: http://www.satishserial.com/issn0972-9348/finaljournal09.pdf
5. Kumar, S. (2012). Role of Folk Media in Nation Building. Retrieved September 2013, from
http://www.voiceofresearch.org: http://www.voiceofresearch.org/doc/v1_i2/v1_i2_16.pdf
6. Mukhopadhyay, K. (1999). Theatre and Politics. Calcutta: Bibhasa.
7. Pandya, S. P. (1990). A Study of The Technique of Abhinaya in Relation to Sanskrit Drama.
Bombay: Somaiya Publications Pvt. Ltd.
10
8. Ramamurti, K. S. (1964). Drama: The Finest Form of Literary Creation. Rupaka Samiksa (pp.
17-22). Tirupati: Sri Venkateshwara University.
9. Richmond, F. (1973, October). The Political Role of Theatre in India. Retrieved September 2013,
from http://www.yavanika.org: http://www.yavanika.org/classes/reader/richmond.pdf
10. Singh, A. (2004). Humanising Education: Theatre in Pedagogy. Retrieved September 2013, from
http://ced.sagepub.com: http://ced.sagepub.com/content/2/1/53.full.pdf
11. Vir Bala Aggarwal, V. S. (2002). Handbook of Journalism and Mass Communication. New
Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
12. Warritay, B. (1988). Communication Development and Theatre Use in Africa. Retrieved
September 2013, from http://archive.lib.msu.edu:
http://archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/africa%20media%20review/vol2no3/j
amr002003008.pdf
13. Xiaoli Nan, R. J. ( .(2004Advertising theory: Reconceptualizing the building blocks. Retrieved
September 2013, from http://www.uk.sagepub.com:
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/chaston/Chaston%20Web%20readings%20chapters%201-
12/Chapter%209%20-%207%20Nan%20and%20Faber.pdf
i
i The authors have chosen to insert in their work relevant extracts or quotations by individuals and
authorities with due attributions instead of trying to express the ideas in their own words
.📄 Pages: 65 🧠 Words: 7490 📚 Chapters: 5 🗂️️ For: PROJECT
👁️🗨️️️ Views: 470