MICROOBIAL EVALUATION OF RAM MILK FROM A DIARY FARM

By

UCHEATU ANN U.

Presented To

Department of Science Technology

31 Pages 4,472 Words 162 Views Microsoft Word Format No. of Chapters: 1 to 5 Chapters

Reference/Bibliography: YES 4,000 NGN PROJECT

ABATRACT

Microbial evaluation of twenty samples of raw milk from a diary farm (Emene fulani cattle rearers) was carried out using five method: viz direct microcopies count nutrient agar count, Blood agar count, Mac conkey agar count (celiforms only) and Acid fast bacilli staring was done to assay for the presence of the Tubercle bacillus. The bacterial was were as follows: direct microscopic counts ranged from 9.0x 105 to 9.5 x 107 counts on Nutrient agar ranged from 9.0 x 104 to 8.0x 105 counts on blood agar ranged from 7.0x 104 to 9.8x10 while counts on Mac country agar ranged between 5.0x 102 to 5 . 0 x 10. The Acid fast bacilli staring did not show a single bacillus, an indication of tubercle free. The gram staring result indicate single chains clusters gram positive bacilli and gram negative bacilli which are characteristics of staphylococcus spp streptococcus spp lactobacillus spp and coliform. it is suggested that milk maids and milk processors should endeavor to wash the udder of the con, sterols their equipment and containers as well as improving their personal hygiene during milk collection . these will contribute to the quality of products in our milk industries as well as the good health of man especially the fulani cattle rearers that drink without pasteurization.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title page
Certification
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
List of table
Table of content

CHAPTER ONE
1.0   introduction
1.1   Background information
1.2   Statement on problem
1.3   Aim and objective of the study
1.4   Hypethesis
1.5   Justification of the study
1.6   Limitation of the study

CHAPTER TWO
2.0   Literature Review
2.1   sources of raw Milk
2.2    composition of raw milk
2.3   Raw Milk as a growth medium
2.4   Sources of contamination of raw Milk.
2.5   Contaminant of raw Milk

CHAPTER THREE
3.0   Methodology
3.1   material and apparatus
3.2   collection of sample
3.3   preparation of culture media
3.4   Quantitative analysis of total bacteria.
3.4.1      Direct Microscopy
3.4.2       Viable plate count
3.4.3   Gram sating
3.4.4   Acid fast Bacilli stain

CHAPTER FOUR
4.0   Results and Discussion
4.1   results
4.2   discussion

CHAPTER FIVE
5.0   Conclusion And Recommendation
5.1   Conclusion
5.2   Recommendation
Reference
Appendix

31 Pages 4,472 Words 162 Views Microsoft Word Format No. of Chapters: 1 to 5 Chapters

Copy/document the link below if you want to visit this page next time

https://e-projecttopics.com/topic/387_microobial-evaluation-of-ram-milk-from-a-diary-farm.html

FOR ENQUIRY
[email protected]
09019904113

Why Students Love to Use e-Project Material?

Guaranteed Delivery: Getting your project delivered on time is essential. You cannot afford to turn in your project past the deadline. That is why you must get your project online from a company that guarantees to meet your deadline. e-Project Topics Material Centre is happy to offer instant delivery of projects listed on our website. We can handle just about any deadline you send our way. Satisfaction Guaranteed: We always do whatever is necessary to ensure every customer's satisfaction.

Disclaimer

e-Project Topics Material Centre will only provide projects as a reference for your research. The projects ordered and produced should be used as a guide or framework for your own project. The contents of the projects should help you generate new ideas and thoughts for your own project. It is the aim of e-Project Topics Centre to only provide guidance by which the projects should be pursued. We are neither encouraging any form of plagiarism nor are we advocating the use of the projects produced herein for cheating.

Terms and Conditions

Using our service is LEGAL and IS NOT prohibited by any university/college policies. You are allowed to use the original model papers you will receive in the following ways:

As a source for additional understanding of the subject
As a source for ideas for your own research (if properly referenced)
For PROPER paraphrasing (see your university definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase) Direct citing (if referenced properly)

Thank you so much for your respect to the author's copyright.