Site Logo E-PROJECTTOPICS

NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF A POTENTIAL READY-TO-USE THERAPEUTIC FOOD (RUTF) FORMULATED FROM SESAME, WHEAT AND SOYA BEANS BLEND


Presented To


Biochemistry Department

๐Ÿ“„ Pages: 90       ๐Ÿง  Words: 10995       ๐Ÿ“š Chapters: 5 ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๏ธ For: PROJECT

๐Ÿ‘๏ธโ€๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ๏ธ๏ธ Views: 322      

โฌ‡๏ธ Download (Complete Report) Now!

ABSTRACT
Ready to-use-therapeutic food (RUTF) is a specially designed product for the nutritional 
rehabilitation of severe acute malnutrition in children over 6 months of age. The potential of 
Sesame-Wheat-Soya beans blend (SWS-RUTF) as a candidate for local formulation of RUTF 
was determined. Three products were formed with varying ratios; SWS-RUTF1 (sesame 25%,
Wheat 10%, soya beans 30%), SWS-RUTF2 (sesame 25%, wheat 15%, soya beans 25%), and 
SWS-RUTF3 (sesame 20%, wheat 10%, soya beans 35%), while soya oil, sugar, and 
mineral/vitamin mix constitutes the remaining 35%. Statistically significant difference (P<0.05) 
was observed in the proximate composition of the products; carbohydrate ranged between 49% -
54%, crude protein (24% to 28%), lipid (9% to 11%), and energy value 404kcal to 411kcal. The 
three formulations had Amino Acid scores of 72, 65 and 75, PDCAAS; 62, 55, and 67, and 
Protein efficiency ratio; 1.08, 1.07, and 1.10, respectively. The percentage change in body weight 
of weanling albino rats used in the research show that all the animal groups fed with SWS-RUTF 
had values that were not significantly different from each other, but significantly (P<0.05) lower 
than animal group fed with Pea nut-based RUTF, and greater than animal group fed with normal
feed. Impact of the product on serum total protein was found to be higher in groups fed with
SWS-RUTF, but the difference was not statistically significant (P< 0.05). Thus, the formulation 
made in this study may serve as candidate for RUTF formulation if improved.
Table of Contents
Title - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . .. ii
Declaration - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .iii
Certification - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. iv
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………………v 
Acknowledgements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vi
Abstract - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. vii
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………..viii
List of Tables - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xi
List of Figures - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . xii
List of Appendices - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. xiii
List of Abbreviations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. xiv
1.0 INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 1
1.1 Statement of Research Problem - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 3
1.2 Justification - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 4
1.3 Aim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 4
1.4 Specific Objectives - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6
2.1.0 Standard pea nut-based RUTF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 7
2.1.1 Ingredients in standard P-RUTF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 7
2.2 Categories of Ready-to-Use Foods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 8
2.2.1 Ready-to-use food (RUF) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8
2.2.2 Therapeutic milk: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 8
2.2.3 Ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSF) - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 8
2.2.4 Ready-to-use complementary foods (RUCF) - - - - - - - - - - - - 9
2.2.5 Fortified blended foods (FBF) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 9
2.2.6 Micronutrient powders (MNP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 9
2.2.7 Lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 9
2.2.8 High-energy biscuits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10
2.2.9 Ready-to-use infant formula (RUIF) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 10
2.2.10 Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 10
2.3 Alternative RUTF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 11
2.3.1 Rice - sesameRUTF 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 11
2.3.2 Barley - sesameRUTF 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 11
2.3.3 Maize - sesameRUTF 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 11
2.4 Proximate Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13
2.4.1 Calorie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 14
2.5 Minerals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15
2.6 Antinutrients - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 15
2.6.1 Trypsin inhibitors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 16
2.6.2 Phytic acid (Phytate) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16
2.6.3 Tannins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17
2.6.4 Oxalates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 17
2.6.5 Saponins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 17
2.7 Protein Quality Evaluation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 18
2.7.1 Methods of determining protein quality - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18
2.8 Body Weight - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 20
2.9 Serum Proteins - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 21
3.0 Materials andMethods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 22
3.1 Materials - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 22
3.1.1 Sesame seeds, wheat, and soya beans - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 22
3.1.2 Chemicals/ reagents - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 22
3.1.3 Experimental Animals………………….………………………………………… - ..……22 
3.2 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 23
3.2.1 Processing of raw materials: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23
3.2.2 Formulation of RUTF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 24
3.2.3 Production of RUTF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25
3.2.4 Proximate analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25
3.2.5 Mineralsanalysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31
3.2.6 Determination of anti-nutritional factors - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 32
3.2.7 Protein quality evaluation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 36
3.2.8 Experimental Animals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40
3.2.9 Statistical Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43
4.0 Results - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44
5.0 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 56
6.0 Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation - - - - - - - - - - - .. 60
6.1 Summary……… - ………………………………………………………………… - …….. 59
6.2 Conclusion…. ….…….……………………………………………………………………. 59
6.3 Recommendations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 61
References - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61
Appendices - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. 67

.

๐Ÿ“„ Pages: 90       ๐Ÿง  Words: 10995       ๐Ÿ“š Chapters: 5 ๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๏ธ For: PROJECT

๐Ÿ‘๏ธโ€๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ๏ธ๏ธ Views: 322      

โฌ‡๏ธ Download (Complete Report) Now!

๐Ÿ”— Related Topics

EFFECTS OF IRON AND ZINC SUPPLEMENTATION ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF CHILDREN UNDER FIVE YEARS IN LAFIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, NASARAWA STATE NIGERIA THE EFFECT OF PROCESSING ON THE NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF FINGER MILLET (ELEUSINE CORACANA) SEED CONSUMPTION PATTERN, STANDARDIZATION OF RECIPES AND NUTRIENT COMPOSITION OF SOME FOODS FROM LIMA BEANS (PHASEOLUS LUNATUS) IN KADUNA STATE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FOOD SECURITY, NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION COPING STRATEGIES IN LOW- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS OF FEDERAL TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS, KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA EVALUATION OF DIETARY PATTERN, ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS AND MICRONUTRIENT STATUS OF ADOLESCENTS ATTENDING SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN JOS SOUTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, PLATEAU STATE HYDROLYSIS OF CASSAVA STARCH BY AMYLASES FROM MAIZE THE EFFECT OF N-HEXANE EXTRACT OF KOLA NITIDA BARK ON LIVER FUNCTION TEST OF ALBINO WISTAR RATS FED WITH HIGH FAT FROM COW'S BRAIN

click on whatsapp